| Tipiṭaka / Tipiṭaka (English) / Saṁyutta Nikāya, English translation |
संयुत्त निकाय २२।१५५
Saṁyutta Nikāya 22.155
The Related Suttas Collection 22.155
१५। दिट्ठिवग्ग
15. Diṭṭhivagga
15. Views
सक्कायदिट्ठिसुत्त
Sakkāyadiṭṭhisutta
Identity View
सावत्थिनिदानं।
Sāvatthinidānaṁ.
At Sāvatthī.
“किस्मिं नु खो, भिक्खवे, सति, किं उपादाय, किं अभिनिविस्स सक्कायदिट्ठि उप्पज्जती”ति?
“Kismiṁ nu kho, bhikkhave, sati, kiṁ upādāya, kiṁ abhinivissa sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjatī”ti?
“Bhikkhus, when what exists, because of grasping what and insisting on what, does identity view arise?”
भगवंमूलका नो, भन्ते, धम्मा …पे…
Bhagavaṁmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā …pe…
“Our teachings are rooted in the Buddha. …”
“रूपे खो, भिक्खवे, सति, रूपं उपादाय, रूपं अभिनिविस्स सक्कायदिट्ठि उप्पज्जति। वेदनाय सति … सञ्ञाय सति … सङ्खारेसु सति … विञ्ञाणे सति, विञ्ञाणं उपादाय, विञ्ञाणं अभिनिविस्स सक्कायदिट्ठि उप्पज्जति।
“rūpe kho, bhikkhave, sati, rūpaṁ upādāya, rūpaṁ abhinivissa sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjati. Vedanāya sati … saññāya sati … saṅkhāresu sati … viññāṇe sati, viññāṇaṁ upādāya, viññāṇaṁ abhinivissa sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjati.
“When form exists, because of grasping form and insisting on form, identity view arises. When feeling … perception … functioning patterns … consciousness exists, because of grasping consciousness and insisting on consciousness, identity view arises.
तं किं मञ्ञथ, भिक्खवे, रूपं निच्चं वा अनिच्चं वा”ति?
Taṁ kiṁ maññatha, bhikkhave, rūpaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
What do you think, bhikkhus? Is form permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चं, भन्ते”।
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.” …
“यं पनानिच्चं …पे… अपि नु तं अनुपादाय सक्कायदिट्ठि उप्पज्जेय्या”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ …pe… api nu taṁ anupādāya sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjeyyā”ti?
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would identity view arise?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“वेदना … सञ्ञा … सङ्खारा … विञ्ञाणं निच्चं वा अनिच्चं वा”ति?
“Vedanā … saññā … saṅkhārā … viññāṇaṁ niccaṁ vā aniccaṁ vā”ti?
“Is feeling … perception … functioning patterns … consciousness permanent or impermanent?”
“अनिच्चं, भन्ते”।
“Aniccaṁ, bhante”.
“Impermanent, sir.” …
“यं पनानिच्चं …पे… अपि नु तं अनुपादाय सक्कायदिट्ठि उप्पज्जेय्या”ति?
“Yaṁ panāniccaṁ …pe… api nu taṁ anupādāya sakkāyadiṭṭhi uppajjeyyā”ti?
“But by not grasping what’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, would identity view arise?”
“नो हेतं, भन्ते”।
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“एवं पस्सं …पे… नापरं इत्थत्तायाति पजानाती”ति।
“Evaṁ passaṁ …pe… nāparaṁ itthattāyāti pajānātī”ti.
“Seeing this … They understand: ‘… there is no return to any state of existence.’”
छट्ठं।
Chaṭṭhaṁ.
The authoritative text of the Saṁyutta Nikāya is the Pāli text. The English translation is provided as an aid to the study of the original Pāli text. [CREDITS »]
